It is shamful to read this sentence: "I am not saying that guy should be killed, however I do not like when people are making such a national issue out of a simple murder, which happened inside one political parties by few members of same parties."

Important part here is the use of word: "SIMPLE". For Maoists how simple is a murder.

Read on thread who said this: http://www.sajha.com/sajha/html/openThread.cfm?forum=122&threadid=59759

Try to understand the mentality of the writer. Some one killed outside their party, they justify the murder as death of a reactionary, and when a murder occures inside the party, they claim: none of your biz. They know how to cut the cheese. Pathetic.

People should continue their andolan, and don't let Maoist form the govt that easily, i.e. without changing the 2/3rd requirement to simple majority. They should be given the govt., and we should watch. We should see their miserable performance in a matter of months. Their government will fall because of their own reason. We will see more YCL/PLA/ Maoists related murders intra and inter party people. Then people will rise. Gyanendra was brought down just by the death of 20 people, how a party responsible for 15,000 people's death gets the Bagdor of the government. People were tired, and said try it with 35% quota. Get a feeling.