? 
I understand what you mean but you know the problem is there: making Nepal a secular is jeaopardy to our culture. Since we are weaker to compete financially with missionaries' millions of dollars in proselytising efforts in Nepal, the secularism doesn't do according to what you say as providing a free space to operate all the religions together. What happens in the long run is: we get uprooted, and our culture gets frozen in the histroy. Its good to allow all the religions but that is to seen in relative sense. Are we well enough to fund as do Christian missionaries now? Are our folks well-educated not to get influenced of their enticing offers while choosing their religion according to their self-will? These are the reasons I see come as hurdle in hurriedly declaring Nepal a secular state. In fact, I know that secularism is a form of democracy and it should be practised but in an ideal state where all the citizens are well educated and financially better off. I respect you guys' concern towards aloowing all religions a due place to operate their activities but the fundamental problem is of ideology: they want proselytisation usiing all the measures: economic, diplomatic and many other state aparatuses but Hindus don't have such programs like proselytisation. You guys are well informed of the facts but lack a serious critical dimension on these issues: especially from the perspective of politics and ideology.
I expect some good thoughts than cheap rantings in this thread (such as Awatar. Grow up Awatar!. U sound like an offspring of Maoists' broken condom while having Comredly sex in the Jungle. I know what comrades say: Haami krantikari haru cheli sanga ratvari eutai ochhyaan ma sutchhau tara kehi gardainau. Beef khana ta timra ....le Rolpa ko jungle mai sikayeka holan ni. Jhan yaha aayera ta kina khadaina thhyau. Khau babu tehi khana ta aayeka holau.