Jana Aandolan 2 never spoke against Hindu religion. It all happened haphazardly due to those mo..f...leaders. Lets not relate Hindu religion with the deeds of brother-killer Gyane, nor is he the incarnation of Lord Vishnu. If it were any incarnation, it could be upto King Birendra's dynasty, because he was a king indeed. I agree with Jhareko Paat that Nepal should remain a Hindu state but that should not reflect in the level of maintaining law and order of the government. Government and religion are different, and it has been different in Nepal for a long time. Unlike the Muslim Shariya law, no dictats of Dharmashastra have been the basis of government laws and constitution in Nepal. Why those mo..f ..u leaders so hurriedly declare Nepal a secular state all of a sudden whereas it was not a prrimary agenda of the Janaaandolan? Its a matter of research. Who was behind this? Possibly a great sum of amount to Maoist-foggers by the Christians? Christian missionaries always want Nepal a secular state so that they could play, just like now. Why the hell such a spectacularly important issue passed so easily and people didn't protest, who used to standstill Nepal against Rhtic Roshan and Madhuri Dixit? It is surprising. I don't blame Nepali people who often a time be the witness of terrible decisions and adhere those. It is because of their illiteracy and consequent disinterestedness. But when they really know these hidden intentions and consequences of wider ramifying decisions, they will come up to the street against these Maoist and other anti-religious elements and missionaries. LETS     GET     UNITED FOR     HINDUISM!!!!