Posted by: bineet February 18, 2008
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
![](/wysiwyg/editor/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif)
![10 more flags than likes deactivates post.](/wysiwyg/editor/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_down.gif)
dhara khollaun ta paani chhaina
khaana pakaun ta gas chhaina
batti ballaun ta bijuli chhaina
baahira jaaun ta gaadi ma tel chhaina
hahaha and triptibhaktajee u still consider the King responsible for the today's condition of the country? very short sighted indeed ! and in diplomacy yes the Kings may have to have contacts with the Maoists to save the nation but that doesn't mean they were working togather to bring the nation down. Your chhotopan to think that way. During the King only 22 people died.. that also when they defied curfew orders. I believe the govt that time showed max restraint. There were incidences where bullets were fired at the security from the mobs to start with. Yet only 22 people died and the King gave the power to the people in mere 19 days. Now in terai, at least 45 people have died in jana andolan 3. Yet not even Sitaula gives up his position. What do u get of that?