Posted by: Bob Marley February 11, 2008
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
LT
Those old days of electing president without prior experience are over. With the world challenging the US in every form possible, the benefit to the citizen if they elect someone with experience is being able to handle it wisely and successfully. Let me ask you, if you were to hire an employee (lets's say the board of the company is getting a new CEO in this case), would you go for someone with instinct or look at the resume and hire a experience one. There's always exception in any filed, no doubt about it. But most practical decision is to go with someone experience, isn't it? So what is so different about electing the president? Don't get me wrong, Obama might be brilliant if elected but there's no fact to support it, except for the hype he's getting with "Change" and "Yes We Can" mantra. And there's nothing radical change that is going to happen if he gets elected. What exactly did you mean "Radical"? It's too vague.
My 2 cents
Those old days of electing president without prior experience are over. With the world challenging the US in every form possible, the benefit to the citizen if they elect someone with experience is being able to handle it wisely and successfully. Let me ask you, if you were to hire an employee (lets's say the board of the company is getting a new CEO in this case), would you go for someone with instinct or look at the resume and hire a experience one. There's always exception in any filed, no doubt about it. But most practical decision is to go with someone experience, isn't it? So what is so different about electing the president? Don't get me wrong, Obama might be brilliant if elected but there's no fact to support it, except for the hype he's getting with "Change" and "Yes We Can" mantra. And there's nothing radical change that is going to happen if he gets elected. What exactly did you mean "Radical"? It's too vague.
My 2 cents