Posted by: lootekukur January 28, 2008
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
jeez, this thread is still going on.
at some point we may have to agree to disagree. as i said, between tendulkar and lara supporters, it's just the matter of personal preferences. i don't think anyone is lesser than the other. for me it's lara since i like someone who is ATTACKING and who can dictate terms on the bowlers EVERYTIME he comes to bat in the middle. i have a HUGE respect for tendulkar though. he probably has wider range of shots than lara and is also perhaps more artistic. but lara is mentally tougher between the two --at least when you average their performances over the years they've played the cricket for. these two definitely are the most prolific run-getters and stylish batsmen of our era.
ricky ponting is also almost there, but he still has some distance to cover before he can be regarded in lara and/or tendulkar's league.
now stop the freakin comparison game. stats and runs are important but techniques and fluency are also equally or more important.
at some point we may have to agree to disagree. as i said, between tendulkar and lara supporters, it's just the matter of personal preferences. i don't think anyone is lesser than the other. for me it's lara since i like someone who is ATTACKING and who can dictate terms on the bowlers EVERYTIME he comes to bat in the middle. i have a HUGE respect for tendulkar though. he probably has wider range of shots than lara and is also perhaps more artistic. but lara is mentally tougher between the two --at least when you average their performances over the years they've played the cricket for. these two definitely are the most prolific run-getters and stylish batsmen of our era.
ricky ponting is also almost there, but he still has some distance to cover before he can be regarded in lara and/or tendulkar's league.
now stop the freakin comparison game. stats and runs are important but techniques and fluency are also equally or more important.
Last edited: 28-Jan-08 02:41 PM