Posted by: ImI January 11, 2008
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Now The issue is not Nepal is good with King or without King?
We have seen with king and without king. I don't see much difference.If King doesn't want to really do politics then he should not have taken that responsibility.I still cannot believe till this date How stupid dumb is Gyanendra.
I cannot believe he was a business man.I have defended Monarchy for the shake of Democracy in Nepal.This is my stance.Otherwise leftist dictatorship is one the way.Balance of power is what we need.But above all people power is the most powerful thing not what we hear the fake power that SPAM has and is cashing Jandolan II mandate.
People change .People change their mind in seconds.How can people not change their minds in 2 years.Do SPAM still have the same mandate?And if so too Mandate was restoration of democracy not federal republic.Not a secular country.
The issue is People should be directly involved in deciding that what they want .There should be true democratic way to decide it ,That is thru referendum.Then if something does happen they we can blame Nepalese for it.
It is not necessarily true that without king the country is not going to exist but It is true that with these leaders the country is not going to exist.And why we are saying this cause we are seeing it.
We have seen with king and without king. I don't see much difference.If King doesn't want to really do politics then he should not have taken that responsibility.I still cannot believe till this date How stupid dumb is Gyanendra.
I cannot believe he was a business man.I have defended Monarchy for the shake of Democracy in Nepal.This is my stance.Otherwise leftist dictatorship is one the way.Balance of power is what we need.But above all people power is the most powerful thing not what we hear the fake power that SPAM has and is cashing Jandolan II mandate.
People change .People change their mind in seconds.How can people not change their minds in 2 years.Do SPAM still have the same mandate?And if so too Mandate was restoration of democracy not federal republic.Not a secular country.
The issue is People should be directly involved in deciding that what they want .There should be true democratic way to decide it ,That is thru referendum.Then if something does happen they we can blame Nepalese for it.
It is not necessarily true that without king the country is not going to exist but It is true that with these leaders the country is not going to exist.And why we are saying this cause we are seeing it.