Posted by: MadDoGG January 11, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

sala chor ..........people like yoiu gave the political leaders and the maoists freakin decades to ruin the country and freakin complain about the king not being able to clear things amongst heavy obstacles and obstruction under two years?????? is that whaere you facts comes from........HE FAILED TO FIX OUR COUNTRY'S PROBLEM.....................you stood silent and watch the country go down the drains in the hands of the politicians and now you blame the King entirely............SALA people like you complain if the king does nothing and still complain when he tries to do something  and wouldnt let him finish............then become master analysts for who ruined Nepal...... what is good and bad for the country...................tero facts ko ta mo chak puchhera falchhu...............ke facts ko kura gaschhas??????..........I do blame the king for something though....why did he give up the power so easily to these political thugs and the maoists.......why did he not order Marshall law and killed all those who were ruining the country???? why did he step down saying he did not want to see anymore innocent blood of any Nepali spilt over his name.....?????........Thats my complain...He should have stood his ground and killed all these so called Netas......who have now slowly started the process to sell Nepal to India......you must be Happy huh?

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article