Posted by: GP January 8, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

AmitRaja: a doctor said to BK "every Nepali  knows politics but not his respective job".

I don't believe that statement is true. Why? All Nepalis who left Nepal and went outside Nepal have performed well with their job? Why? It is because either they have good leadership or because they are leaders in their biz because the political or non-political leadership in that country offers them desire and motivation to work. But, in Nepal, we lack motivation from top leadership. Majority of political leaders are corrupt, morally useless, and they talk one think do else, they are not transparent, and that bring frustration. A very good friend of mine (formerly) got political appointment to Chairman position in a corporation because of his relation with politics, and his first job was to fire 500 staffs (about), and appoint the party cadres from his party. He simply does not have organizational leadership experience to lead a corporation. Initially, I was just wondering how can he handle a trouble corporation, and later I realized that "Oops, he does not have to do any by himself, because he will be asked everything he has to do". He is there to make public fool with his "pure" educational background. He does not have his degree in the best interest of his corporation. What inspiration or motivation will he offer? When he starts firing his employees on the very first week, what message he sends to his employees? His employees have to surrender to other political party for the protection.

So, whoever is that Doctor, he does not know the reality of the ground.

GP

 

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article