Posted by: ImI January 7, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
HAHA.. day dreaming ..ani dialogue phool ko ankha ma..Let me tell you few flaws in your day dream.
1.CA within a year? are you kiddin ?Full proportional should be There and for that forget about CA for next 5 years.
2.So it take 1 full year after CA (your CA)to write a freaking constitution?In this pace the whole country has no direction?
3.So it takes 2 full year after election to form a hanging govt. cause no one if there is election going to have majority and as history repeats itself again sell and buy of MP.
4.Nepal will be a federal country with powerful central government and decentralized and de-regulated local governments..wrong buddy ..federal govt is going to be so weak after giving power of self determination.Decentalization was always there ..the problem was implementation ..There is no perfect decentral policy that suits Nepal  "bikendrikaran"
5.King will be investor ?oh ya instead of packing back and investing where their is return he is going to invest in country where we see clearly major labor problem and which 5 hydro projects?and how much Nepalese are getting (if )after completion?
6.OK schools are there just not affordable for poor nepalese.
7. Tourist destination..It is ..i give you that ..even kTM is oneof the polluted city people still come.
8.Financial hub ???in what basis- what resource?what infrastructure? and with major labor problem like West bengal. biggest joke - switzerland , singapore ..lets make it switzepore
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article