Posted by: CopiCat January 7, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

If India is to bring chaos in Nepal, will it be able to save itself out of the burning flame given its open boarder and  also religious, cultural and political proximity?  I don't believe China will be a slient viewer if India tries to attack over the Nepalese sovereinty. Doesn't India understand what is going on in Darjling now a days, forget about Sri Lanka, Bhutan whatever?

Let's not be so much pessimistic. Now we are in the democratic era. In fact, this is high time to discuss about the modality of federalism and political structure in Nepal but not the continuation of kingship. Even we can not revert the political process that has already gone very far. In the transitional period, people do express their own prospectives but it will gradually take a shape. Every section of the soceity wants its agenda included. It is not bad too. Lets think about the prosperous future of Nepal. Forget the King and his entourages. They had nothing to deliver but the hollow nationalism that never let Nepalese rise above the poverty. They are tyring to throw the same card now too but it will never work as Nepalese have already understood. They cannot cheat Nepalese people anymore.

As far as political leaders and SPA are concerned, we cannot say they are very much competent. But every Nepalese has chance to be a leader if he or she is competent enough, then why should we vent our speen over them only? Sirak bhitra bata aula thadyauna and criticize garna jaslai pani sajilo hunchha, maidan ma kam garna garho hunchha. Isn't that we who made leaders like the leaders we have now?

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article