Posted by: BathroomCoffee January 7, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

TRISHUL,

If that was his best then his best was not good for the country. I WAS NOT TRYING TO COMPARE ENRON TO NEPAL. I WAS JUST DRAWING AN ANALOGY. NOW WOULD YOU HAVE KEPT KEN LAY AS A CEO EVEN AFTER ALL THE CORRUPTION ? NO

I OWE NOTHING TO THE KING. WHAT DID HE DO FOR ME THAT I SHOULD OWE HIM ANYTHING. TAKING CARE OF THE COUNTRY WAS HIS JOB AND HE FAILED. TO ME THAT IS PLAIN AND SIMPLE AND END OF STORY. WHAT HIS ANCESTER DID FOR THE COUNTRY HAS NO BEAR ON HIM.

HE WAS GIVEN THE POWER BY ITS CITIZENS TO TAKE CARE OF THE INSURGENCY AND HE FAILED.

 

TYO LAMBEY CHAUDEY TANERA FACTS LAI NA LUKAU.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article