Do not compare Nepal to Enron or any other company. More than that, it was not the king that failed, but the conscience was lost among us Nepalese including you. The king tried to do his best, but the India and some people from within our country strangled his neck. Believe me, if our country had touched Bangaladesh or the Ocean, the King would have been probably successful. Your logic indicates that he should have been more aggressive which is  simply unacceptable to a constitutional monarchy. 

You seem to be  adamant on your views on king Gyanendra. The constitutional king can never act the way you prefere except when the very existence of the nation is in threat. They should always stay aside from taking any action, because action always carries controversy.  As Doofy pointed out before " Nepalese should realize that we owe to the institution of monarchy lot more than what we owe to the political parties. Every Nepalese at least owe their identity to the insitution of monarchy."    You accept it or not, but that's hard truth even for you to claim as a Nepalese.  Just let the monarchy continue as an unconditional symbol of national unity. If you can not give due respect to the Institute that owe your identity, just keep your mouth close. We can no longer tolerate your hatred.