Posted by: BathroomCoffee January 7, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

Trishul,

India will never openly invade Nepal. But they will invisibly interfere and exploit us to protect their interests in Nepal. As far as Nepali Tigers.. he he Yeah they will try and do the same to Nepal they did to Sri Lanka(that is the furthest they will go)

If you look back at the history of mankind its not so easy to annex a country against their will. Look at Palestine(oocupation by Israel), Afganisthan(occupation by USSR), Iraq(Occupation by US).

And if you ask any educated Nepali guys too.. he he they all hate Indians and would like to beat them up too(whats your point ?).

I am not necessarily against monarchy. But the fact that Gyaney sat on his ass and did nothing. I see him as a failed King. And I don't see the point of bringing him back knowing that he failed before. Tyo NEPALI BHEDA BUDDHI JUSTO DHIIIT NAGARAU(Would you bring Ken Lay back as Enron's Ceo again ?) .

We have to be reasonable.... NOT JUST BLINDLY SUPPORT GYANEY TO SIT ON HIS ASS AND DO NOTHING AGAIN.

 
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article