Posted by: Trishul January 7, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

For Bathroomcoffe who make this point: " And India will never take over Nepal they already have Pakisthan, Tamil Tigers, Khalisthan, Hndus and Muslims to worry about ... they dun need Nepali Republic tigers to add to that. "

Man, forget about Republican Tigers! If I'm correct, we already have Madhesi Tigers. तराइ ले थर्काउदा सुरुवाल भिजेको पनि थाहा पाउनुपर्‍यो। I could not understand why some people have hard time to realize the fact that India is creating all those chaos in order to make every Institute of this tiny country failed so that they can annex it. I saw some people argue that India's interest is only to tap down the water resources. तर, हामी सँग के नै बाँकी छ र? गन्डक, कोशी, महाकाली को  पानी त पहिले नै ईन्डिया लाई बेची सकेका होइनन र? बाँकी रहेको बागमती र केही नदी मा कती नै पानी बाँकी छ र? My point is that Indians still believe that Nepal is a leftover in their federal union. It's not only the Indian authority, you can feel it in every Indian's blood. Go and talk to some educated Indian guys, then only you might realize the fact.

Monarchy is the only Institute that can provide an uncoditional symbol of national unity in Nepal. I agree with the points made by chana tarkari and GP except about making an educated peoples team to help the king. Definitely, we are not advocating here for an absolute monarchy. तर, राजा लाई  सबै को साझा बनाउम। Let's give due respect  to this Institute and let's not make absurd comment on it.  Let's work to foster the true democracy in Nepal, not the Girija typo. Let's make every politicians mandatory to be accountable to the people of Nepal.  जनता को दुहाइ दिएर सबै निर्णय आँफै गर्ने प्रबिती को भन्दाफोर गरौम। Let's analyse what went wrong in our democracy and national integrity. Let's brainstorm and put our collective voices here to get back our proud Nepal.

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article