Posted by: GP January 7, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

I hear you, Channa Tarkaari, when you said:

"I felt so embaraassed when Mr. Fataha Baburam was declaring in BBC that we need CA election just to rubber stamp their republic declaration and decide the date to chase away the King from our country."

Note: the phrase: TO RUBBER STAMP. Funny is not it?

Well, I am not sure anyone out here will dare to go back to Nepal and work with alienated King, and face YCL action:

"Yeah I may support Kingship once again if and only if all educated King's supporters who are currently working or living abroad decide to go back Nepal to help for the troubled King. In such a case, King certainly would have a team of good people who know how to build the nation addressing the problems, how to clean the dirt left by parties and how to develop the nation fast. "

It is not going to happen. I was talking in my earlier posting about who is less worst. My previous posting was just about my wishes. Nepal is going to be a Republic country, and another Bhutan. Atleast 100,000 people will die in next 5 years, and millions will go to India and become new Indians. This will happen in a matter of week, before Indian Army invades Nepal. Indian army will face a fate like in Sri Lanka in 1988 or so, but they will not return like they returned from Sri Lanka, rather they will be posted in Northern Border of Nepal. Meantime, Blood thirsty Maoist + YCL will run over Kathmandu, and Kathmandu will see blood everywhere.Some lucky will be successful in crossing Nepal Borderto Indian border and reach beyond the border. Maoist concept of dividing country according to your surname or race will be prime reason behind all these happenings. Maoism will be Plague in Modern Nepal. I wish I am wrong.

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article