Posted by: doofy January 6, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

^ Exactly! no tention

The hardliner monarchists and the hardliner republicans are both retarded people. They are truely biased people. Both of them share more or less same responsibilty for what the country is now.

Someone said here that the king got chance for one and half year, had public support and messed it all up. The truth is that the king placed himself in totally wrong place. So, from the starting he was heading for a failure. Noone in this world can succeed from that place. A country like Nepal need "INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT". This is all due to the grace of hardliner monarchists.

The king is doing a right thing now. Sometimes silence does all the work for you. He sould remember he need to be the king of all nepalese..........be it monarchists or republicans. This is the only way to survive.

And Nepalese should realize that we owe to the institution of monarchy lot more than what we owe to the political parties. Every Nepalese at least owe their identity to the insitution of monarchy.

Last edited: 06-Jan-08 02:04 PM
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article