Posted by: NayaSadak January 4, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

We think having democracy, we will be handed with a magic stick and all problems in past will be solve stirring the magic wand.

All party politicians tried to capture their seat and work in favour of interest. Did any one showed and showing National Interest??? King has some National interest, as long as there is Nepal he would be the king (in past).

Why the Girija had to dissolve , even Congress was in majority???? Why the leading party could not solve the problem will alliance with other parties???? No one has National interest other than personal and party. There was a loophole in construction and why they did not try to fix it???

Now we wanted him to solve the problems when took the power. We are EXPERT to blame others other than to take the responsibility. After taking the power asked to have the election, why non parties ready to participate. They did not see benefiting participating in the election and boycotted.

I am not saying king is flawless, he has done mistakes but more mistakes and unforgivable mistakes had done by ruling party then and now. Now Nationality is in stake.

I am afraid , How long we will be able to say we are Nepali and our country is Nepal. We will be treated as slave of Indians if we became one of the state of India. We will be named BAHADUR as we said them dhoti.

 

 

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article