Posted by: nycketa January 4, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

It is time for New Nepal. I just wish Royal family have played constructive roles in the lives of Nepali just like Kings and Royal families of Thailand, England, Japan, and other Scandanavian countries. The only thing I can think of is they are head of Pashupatinath Fund, Redcross Fund, World Heritage Fund, and Lumbini Trust Fund.

I have yet to see One good Development during the King's reign. I heard King Mahendra was a visionary leader. Other than that, it has been a huge burden economically to Nepal. King G tried to rule directly. People were hoping some changes would come. But he messed up badly. Everyone thought he would turn things around. Actually, NONE OF THE LEADERS ARE WORTH MENTIONING. They are all corrupted and are hard qualified as a leader.

I just feel there has been lot of discrimination and continue to be in the name of Hinduism and the King. We have to give opportunities to all different race and ethnicity. Economic Development is impossible under the old system.With secular and new Nepal, there is opportunities for eveyrone. Every Nepali is treated equally.

 

 

 

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article