Posted by: dav January 3, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
Being king of nepal is really tough, and challenging . He accepted, and tried to make country better on his own way, but nobody supported him. If some neta's have supported him, he wouldn't have choose giri or thapa's. But bad luck, nobody even tried to understand him. His family is safe, does this mean, he's a killer? Why is he not doing anything, while everybody expecting something from him, He wants to get rid being nepali king. Everybody loves king birendra, and hates Paras, that's the only cause that everybody hates gyanendra. I prefer king gyanendra, but I can't see Paras as a king.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article