Posted by: MadDoGG January 3, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        

As far as I recall....King Birendra was a good King but not a good ruler........he let the situation get from bad to worse in his rule...........He didnt say or do a thing when corruption was at its worst in Nepal hence giving birth to Maoists.......As for King gyanendra........He sacked all the leaders the curropt ones to try and bring peace to the country..........thats when two sore enemies joined hands( maoists and the SPA).....the new gang of terrorist and master mind curropt leaders made the situation so bad that the king was lagging behind making him look like a dick. Every time he tried to do something...the maoist and the leaders intensified the situation and made sure there was more death and destruction that would blame the king................I dont recall King Birendra going to all these small maoist infected villages to comfort people.........King Gyanendra showed his support, love  and bravery for the people by visiting all these places where he could have easily been assasinated...............you cant stand straight in a boat in rough waters.

 the politicians destroyed the country for more than a decade and made it worse when the maoist started killing innocent nepali people........thats when King Gyanengra stepped in ..........how can we expect a next day miracle when we allowed the maoists and the political curropts more than a decade to ruin the country and we didnt give the king two years to straighten it out??????????......now how can that be fair??? and with the heavy conspiracy moves by the maoists and the new spa to spoil any improvement from the kings side, how do we judge the king for not trying???? Didnt he try????? only to be intentionally be hampered by the sacked politicians. the king is a ruler not a politician......and dirty politics can overturn anything. I know that people blame King Gyanendra for his brothers demise.....well If he was so Full of power hunger to rule why did he give it up sooooooo easily. I believe he had the army and the armed police behind him awaiting orders.......he could have easily ordered a marshall law and dictated....like in Burma. But his last speech was..."please stop the killing of innocent people....if my stepping down brings peace to the country than I will step down for the peoples welfare........please stop this bloodshed "     now that didnt sound like a power hungry King.......now had I killed my entire family for the sake of power and had made the ultimate sacrifice, aprice so high...........I dont think Id give a crap for others life..........now thats just IF i had done the unthinkable to achieve the throne...........As for Paras.......as a young teen........how many of us were unruly, parent offending, party animal, freind loving, rebels?????? have you grown out of it???? I have....now do I want to be judged by every bad thing I did as a teenager..........????? Do you.....think about it.

As far as the kingdom stands...............I believe it is the only ONLY solution for unity in our country.....even just a ceremonial king.

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article