Posted by: gyanbahadur January 3, 2008
Nepal good with king or without king? have your say
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
I think the seven party acted hastily in declaring republic and over threw monarchy without thinking several consequences. They should have to think that just like Maoist; royalist is still a big force in Nepal. Royalist will try to agitate and there will be more violence for sure. They absolutely didn't care about people's opinion. I still think that vast number of Nepali people wants monarchy. I think one of the main problem the country will face is lack of patriotism in Nepali people. Patriotism in its citizen is key for a nation to prosper, and I don't think the current corrupted leaders will be able to win the heart of Nepali citizen, especially if their path to the power is filled with blood of innocent Nepali people. I still think monarchy has the symbolic power of unifying the country and developing patriotism in people. I don't want my kids to read in their history lessons about Maoist leaders, and corrupted Girija as national heroes and the age old shah dynasty that established Nepal as an independent nation in this globe, as the biggest villain of modern Nepal.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article