Posted by: GP December 8, 2007
Prachanda on Sajha Sawal BBC: Excerpts
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
Fablous can not be a Maoist or YCL agent. He does not guts to defend Maoists or YCL. If he was real Maoist or YCL, he should have defended or looked for another EXCUSE  of YCL or Maoist action against the Tourists, this way:

"The tourist just tried to deny our record keeping process, we were not asking for donation, but we wanted to keep the record of tourists going in and out, so that they are protected, and rescue operation can issued. Instead of providing the requested information, the tourist started attacking on us, and our people defended themselves. We regret that the royalist and big media houses ran twisting the real story, as a part of grand design to defame us."

Fablous's atma-alochana does show a sign that he might be far cousine of YCL or Maoists (= "Alochanatmaka saath Support" = this language is used quite frequently by UML and Maoists when Nepali Congress brings some "GOOD for the people" proposals that the Maoists and UML can not deny, but they also don't like it because NC gets credit.), but not an actual Maoist supporters.

Bichara Fablous also whispered here: "Pare ma dodharai ma .... YCL ko support nagaroo partyline chhootne, YCL ko Biroodh garoo flip flop bhahine....Pare ma dodharai ma .... "

YCL and Maoists are two wrong things in Nepal, and two wrong people can not bring any right thing. Some people here with "Alochanatmak Support" category that Republic agenda was brought to us by Maoists, and we should support them for it. Nope. It is called :

Stockholm syndrome is a psychological response sometimes seen in an abducted hostage, in which the hostage shows signs of loyalty to the hostage-taker, regardless of the danger (or at least risk) in which the hostage has been placed.  In many instances the victims choose to remain loyal to their abuser, and choose not to leave him or her, even when they are offered a safe placement .... For detailed info on SS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

Some of our Sajha.com writers think that Maoists should be credited for Republican agenda, I understand the agenda is a noble agenda, but it has a lot of hidden agenda, let me cite GPK's phrase "Grand Design", to abduct / highjack Nepali people like a child kidnapper offers LollyPop to a child. Unfortunately, Gagan Thapa and Narahari Acharya were successfully trapped in this trap. We should not forget that same bunch of people sometime write in Kantipur that they had Karyagat Ekata with King Birendra, were in touch with Dhirendra Shah (if they were in touch with Birendra and Dhirendra, were they in denial to Gyanendra as identified by RCP). Now they talk about Royalists are Nationalists .... blah blah .... Lets not get trapped by Maoist grand design .... I certainly want Nepal be Republic, but I don't want Gyanendra be replaced by Prachanda. Thats it, so simple. If Prachanda comes to power, we will see more tourist harassed, their camera confiscated because they might be afraid of passing their suppression method to the outside world. We will be under more suppression under Maoist regime then in Gyanendra's regime. If you know Game Theory, when in dilemma, you have to select one, rather I will say don't select the one that can harm you more. Game Theory is about less Risk taking based on statistical method, at this moment, Royalists are less dangerous than Maoists. Let Royalists remain in corner. If political leaders continue to turn MultiParty system into  Partyless MultiParty system through Bhagbanda, and proposed PROPERTIONAL SYSTEM, there is a possibility that Royalists might rise again, and Partyless MultiParties should be blamed for the scenario. God Bless Nepal.

Learn about Stockholm syndrome, and 101 concept on Game Theory / Risk Analysis. In Statistical world, there is no space for "CLOSED FORM SOLUTION". I stand behind Nepal Army, Nepal Police, normal Nepali citizen, Government Employees, and Nepali Journalists despite they have some weakness.

PS: I will edit it later.  If you find some of my past postings deleted in sajha.com (by me, not by San, as San does not delete unless it contains OBJECTIONABLE contains. Thats a big difference between MySansar.com and Sajha.com. Sajha.com's reEdit/Delete function is a great addition. I love that. Thanks, San. ), you may visit my ARTIFACTs collection center: http://www.nwob.org/ (Nepalese Without Borders).

Read Full Discussion Thread for this article