Samsara:

Whatever i know is enough for me to make my comments. You seem to see everything great and good in Tibet and Dalai Lama and that makes me wonder.

But i would still label him as the same and your points would not prove much. They were the glories of the past and i still fail to understand why he should be given any importance at Present. Politics is same everywhere and Tibet was no different. You can give all rationale as to how great the country was but again say that one in a family was made a monk? Common now, who would want to be a monk on their own will unless someone makes them?

religious politics is the worst form of dictatorship and i do not need your logic to understand that.