Posted by: Dananah October 14, 2007
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
wasnt "marriage" created in the 1st place for our needs?so its only understandable that as we humans change(evolve?), so will our requirements? and its only logical to amend them as we go along?
the homosapiens we are..havent we been tryin to make life easier for us since we can last remember?anyways if marriage was to be revolutionised in such a way..i guess we need to edit the wedding vows too?
and do you *please insert name* vow to take this lady..to love her and cherish her..thru thick and thin...errr for the next 7 yrs? after which both of you will have an option to quit or to renew the vows?
hmm in hindu ritual..instead of the sath(7) pheres(circle?)...we need to only one?saves wedding time eh?how about 1/7 of prayers too?haha ;oP
seriously...why still have such a thing called marriage when you want it to be short term eh?doesnt that contradict the whole sacrosanct idea of marriage?
or is it just me who conceives such an idea?
hehe...let me share an idea that just conjured in my mind(hope im not subconsciously plagiarising!;oP).. if there really is a need of such a marriage..then lets have "trial-marriage" an OFFICIALLY recognised union of 2 ppl!but on trial!wahahaha 
im pretty sure such a trial-marriage cover the areas of concern that anamika1 put forth. There will be no legal proceedin in this trial-marriage..and more importantly!even society have to accept it and not have much objection when the trial-marriage fails?cos its a trial for gawdsake!;oP hehe
i dunno if anyone else noticed this two things about Pauli;
would we be hearing such an idea from someone who is having a successful marriage?politician or not?smthing to ponder eh?which means marriages do work too!tho we are apprehensive about it!;oP
and from a guy's(myself!other guys might not agree with me!even pigs dun think alike ok!and we are guys!;oP hehe) perspective..if ur a sexist and u believe that its advantageous to females..i seriously have doubts!:oD
the homosapiens we are..havent we been tryin to make life easier for us since we can last remember?anyways if marriage was to be revolutionised in such a way..i guess we need to edit the wedding vows too?
and do you *please insert name* vow to take this lady..to love her and cherish her..thru thick and thin...errr for the next 7 yrs? after which both of you will have an option to quit or to renew the vows?
hmm in hindu ritual..instead of the sath(7) pheres(circle?)...we need to only one?saves wedding time eh?how about 1/7 of prayers too?haha ;oP
seriously...why still have such a thing called marriage when you want it to be short term eh?doesnt that contradict the whole sacrosanct idea of marriage?
or is it just me who conceives such an idea? hehe...let me share an idea that just conjured in my mind(hope im not subconsciously plagiarising!;oP).. if there really is a need of such a marriage..then lets have "trial-marriage" an OFFICIALLY recognised union of 2 ppl!but on trial!wahahaha im pretty sure such a trial-marriage cover the areas of concern that anamika1 put forth. There will be no legal proceedin in this trial-marriage..and more importantly!even society have to accept it and not have much objection when the trial-marriage fails?cos its a trial for gawdsake!;oP hehei dunno if anyone else noticed this two things about Pauli;
- "glamorous German Politician"
- "divorced twice" :oS
would we be hearing such an idea from someone who is having a successful marriage?politician or not?smthing to ponder eh?which means marriages do work too!tho we are apprehensive about it!;oP and from a guy's(myself!other guys might not agree with me!even pigs dun think alike ok!and we are guys!;oP hehe) perspective..if ur a sexist and u believe that its advantageous to females..i seriously have doubts!:oD