Weren't Ranas the byproduct of Royals? Ridiculous! History! Who let them come up? Is it UML, Congress, or other parties? Plots over and over and over. Maharanis were busy in plotting all along. The royal history is full of plots paupers!!!! It is up to now!!! You see the royal massacre in front your eyes and in front your head!!! You can not think of that coz you are blind of rajbhakti. No one denies the positive contribution made by Prithwi Narayan Shah. Is it the only reason you want to continue the royal raj for ages? Is it the only reason you want to support the mandales forever? Why don't you make all descendents of PN Shah the kings and ministers of Nepal. If you go to Gorkha, you still find descendents of PN Shah ferrying heavy loads on their back from Anbu Khareni all the way up to the top of the mountain villages.Show mercy to all of them man! It is the game of time. Time is not always same. If you go back to my earlier strings, I have mentioned that King was respected in some time in the history. It is now over. You backward looking man!!!  

What is the harm supporting Netas. I agree, Netas are corrupt. I am not supporting this or that Neta. This is totally opposite to your philosophy. You support only the signle person. But I support the system. Netas come and go, they are just the players, they are not the system itself. If there is the system in place, only you can think of this and that. If you have a house, you can think of decorating, layouting. If you don't have a house, what do you think of paupers?