Posted by: chanaa_tarkaari June 22, 2007
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
The way RHSubedi gone mad in above post clearly shows that how furious is he upon this issue. His unnecessary and irrelevant threat to BC unmask his true nature before us. Why you want to bring wife and daughter of BC in the issue ? 
Why not son of BC? See, this shows your character. You have an hidden moron inside you that thinks wife and daughters are weakness of your opponent. So, you want them to drag into debate in your defence? 
I never imagined a person like him could plunge down that far for a minor reason. Like BC, there are a lot other people including me, who are not convinced on his dead-attempts of hiding his involvement with Xnepali. I appreciate cyberharke and crystalcracker in bringing the truth on surface. I must say, I don't doubt on the legitimacy of the proofs you presented here.
To be honest, i was not buying the blame on RHSubedi at first. It was a stunning news for me that a rated X-site is run by such a decent person, which I definitely was seeking clarification from him. He tried his best but now he is crossing the limit. He writes - "Firstly, that video clip was posted at sajha" Ask San Pradhan why sajha posted that clip here?. - quoting from Xnepali, the same site which is so generous to laundary RHSubedi?? why?? for what purpose?? Does he believe San dai and Sajha is more responsible than him? I noticed Sajha removed the video and the thread as soon as it was criticized by some people like BC and others. Also Sajha banned a guy Power, who put the content. He was writing again with a different ID few days later but I don't know if he was banned again or what. I don't think it is fair to drag Sajha in defence of what RHSubedi did was write. He tried to use San's email too in his defence, for which San later clarified before us.
Just remind you an urdu proverb Mr. RHSubedi -
सिंढियों से गिरा आदमि फिर बुलन्द हो सकते है, लेकिन नजरों से गिरा आदमि - कभि नहि ।।
I do not know any of you web-masters but reading this thread, I just could not stop telling you what I feel now. Nothing personal to you RHSubedi, but if you still feel you are defending yourself smartly, then you are wrong.
Why not son of BC? See, this shows your character. You have an hidden moron inside you that thinks wife and daughters are weakness of your opponent. So, you want them to drag into debate in your defence?
I never imagined a person like him could plunge down that far for a minor reason. Like BC, there are a lot other people including me, who are not convinced on his dead-attempts of hiding his involvement with Xnepali. I appreciate cyberharke and crystalcracker in bringing the truth on surface. I must say, I don't doubt on the legitimacy of the proofs you presented here.
To be honest, i was not buying the blame on RHSubedi at first. It was a stunning news for me that a rated X-site is run by such a decent person, which I definitely was seeking clarification from him. He tried his best but now he is crossing the limit. He writes - "Firstly, that video clip was posted at sajha" Ask San Pradhan why sajha posted that clip here?. - quoting from Xnepali, the same site which is so generous to laundary RHSubedi?? why?? for what purpose?? Does he believe San dai and Sajha is more responsible than him? I noticed Sajha removed the video and the thread as soon as it was criticized by some people like BC and others. Also Sajha banned a guy Power, who put the content. He was writing again with a different ID few days later but I don't know if he was banned again or what. I don't think it is fair to drag Sajha in defence of what RHSubedi did was write. He tried to use San's email too in his defence, for which San later clarified before us.
Just remind you an urdu proverb Mr. RHSubedi -
सिंढियों से गिरा आदमि फिर बुलन्द हो सकते है, लेकिन नजरों से गिरा आदमि - कभि नहि ।।
I do not know any of you web-masters but reading this thread, I just could not stop telling you what I feel now. Nothing personal to you RHSubedi, but if you still feel you are defending yourself smartly, then you are wrong.