VISHONTAR-Jee: I have a small question, out of many big questions. I would be enlightened if you could answer me: Many people believe that King Gyanendra masterminded the royal massacre and killed Birendra's family. A murderer gets severe punishment, he hasn't; he is still living a handsome life, maybe little crippled without the power. You have sympathy for the killed brother and family or the killer? You don't believe that he killed his Birendra's family. Fine. I think Nepal is too poor to feed this luxurious Narayanghti palace. I live in a village where there are people who, if don't work a SINGLE day, have to spend night in hunger. And, the king of these many hungry people, increased the fund of Naryanghiti Palace by thousands of dollars. You have sympathy for the rich King or poor Nepali that die of hunger? If you try to see the stoned king as an incident irrespective all other happenings, rather with unqualified absolute approach, I have nothing to say. If you have sympathy for both parties in either of the cases I mentioned, I will try to believe that you have rised above the human emotions, or even have reached close to "Nirvana."