We Need to Keep the Crown in Nepal because it is our History. It was the crown that unified Nepal. Nepal is of different cast culture, religion and races. The crown unified all this and kept hold of it for more then 200 years in many way. The Nepali royal palace has always represented Nepal as one and same even though we are different. Like many horses pull one carriage, because they are put together by one lease held by the rider. The same way even though we are different we have always bid together by some invisible thread that had held by the Palace as a binding knot. Yes the Kings days are over, but that does not mean that we should remove them, keep the crown as a museum as it is done in the west. As an identity of our Country’s origin. After all it was them who unified Nepal. India’s royalty was destroyed by British, and now it seems like our royalty is being destroyed by Chinese idealist. We don’t need that. I love history, also therefore I would like to remember in future how our country was originated, by preserving our history with the royal tradition. I am not saying that the King should be one in all. People should have the power and command to Nepal army, but the royalty should be our countries representative. Also for the sake of the country’s future, India respects Nepali Royalty, partly because they lost their own and also that Royal palace represents Hindu king. So India always will be soft on this matter that we have a Hindu Kind, where India itself is a Hindu nation. Therefore they also look up to the Royal palace of Nepal with respect. China, well they don’t really care, weather there is a king or Maoist leader in the top. There are very few monarchy left across the world, and especially in Asia. So why not keep our history as it is. Let the people rule in Nepal, and monarchy stay alive under people’s supervision. Any comments??