So again I think the problem with you is how long the King has lived in the palace!! I see no problem who lives where and for how long, Unlike presidents you can't expect Kings to move from one palace to another then that would also not be right, it would be like Saddam Hussein owning several Presidential palaces. I still think nepal was a far better place to live in and also declared by many countries a Zone of peace during the time of Late King Birendra, whether you call it supression or opression at least there was peace. Talking about sarki and damai's I don't think the King has a hand in it. Hinduism brought about the caste system and people who got the opportunity made the most of it by discriminating ones own by thinking they were lower caste. It is sad and pathetic but I have heard that the Shah kings never felt superior in caste and creed and always treated everyone in their kingdom with respect.