hey hajambhayena,,, what is the point for u to like monarchy that u are so much after it?the monarchial system has never been good ,,exceptions some kings are diligent in the world history.and the kingship is a very old kind of system and scientifically not suitable for the present world.how come the succesors of a king are necessarily capable of leading a country?for instance can u imagine paras ,,using all the powers and leading the country,,and what can you predict about the succesor?A country should be led by a person capable of doin it and selecting that person is the theme of democracy.And talking about Nepali king ,,Nepali people had accepted him as constitutional,he tried to get supreme power ,never realised people cannot accept absolute monarchy in this time,,,so virtually lost a chance of being at least a ceremonial one! right now ,nepali people have got their identity all over the world as the brave ones to fight against the absolute monarchy and gettin rid of it..how come theres the identity crisis? dont worry friend we"ll not be refugees ......... what do ya think??//