Posted by: sujanks September 1, 2006
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
![](/wysiwyg/editor/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif)
![10 more flags than likes deactivates post.](/wysiwyg/editor/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_down.gif)
hmnn... yes. but, there has to be a solution...
there cannot be another communist state. we already know the results of a communist goverment. so, making prachanda chief executive is out of question unless he steps down to a more democratic rule. i mean, he must be an intelligent man to even question himself the consequences of establishing communist rule in nepal, which has only 17% arable land.
i must be a fool to even think of offering any guidance or suggestion to already experienced political leaders of the country, but how can i voice them to think quickly. i mean look at KG. He stepped down right. he though he could take care of stuff and started a direct rule. but, he eventually stepped down. but a hunge ensemble was needed to achieve this. there must be a way to make the maoists step down. i am not saying that their ideology is wrong, but it's 21st century. Looking back at 80 years of history, communism just doesn't work. It worked a little in infant modern china and the soviet federation. but, both countries have accepted the notion of going forward together by respecting others perspective on economy and politics.