If the method was sole intimidation India wouldn't have got independence so quickly.It was the strength of the masses which brought change.Had maoist been able to at least show that much support in KTM as in jandalon II , the maoist wouldn't be considered terrorist would they????? Again i am saying forget who says what to whom.what matters is what you think?The police killed and some incidents are your trying to justify the cause.Well u may be i never said you can't but i am just talking about the method!!! when you travelling to go to work in the morning and some body bombs the trains!!! you justifying that as greater good!!!!!! well dude i just want to understand this there is difference and there will always be difference between freedom fighters and terrorist!!! even if maoist comes to power , do you think i will call them freedom fighters.NO never!!! It is what i believe.But remember Even british considers Indian freedom fighters as freedom fighters..see the difference!! again , it doesn't matter who says what !!it matters what you think!!!!i have given several example .why ones freedom fighter can be one terrorist not denying!!for the freedom fight killing 5000 lives in US 911 was nothing ,i assume u believe in that. I also assume that you do not believe that bombing of train in bombay, bombing of bus in nepal, plain hitting twin towers is not terrorism in your dictionary.It is freedom fight!!! Good luck !!!