It’s easy to write anything on blank paper. Baburam and Prachanda wrote violence on innocent/ignorant minds. Violent generate anger; no vioelnce no anger. Anger is a great negativity and it always makes you suffer. You can not feel happy and angry at the same time. It will take generations to erase that bloody negativity. Wait people, sick society is coming, the gift of Baburam and Prachanda! People of remote Nepal were/are ignored by governments; that was perfect injustice. Baburam and Prachanda had choice to educate them and revolt against the government non-violently. They could have done what Gandhi did and what Martin Luther did. I have seen documentary of Martin Luther. When black people came in the street, the US government ordered police to torture them. Having seen that injustice white people came to the street for the right’s of black. Quest for justice is a program which installed in the brain of every human being. Baburam and Prachanda are psychologically sick people who filled negativity in innocent/ignorant brains. I bet we would have gotten more than what we have today if they had chosen non-violence. If they went to Rukum and Rolpa and educate people to fight against the injustice non-violently. I would have saluted them. They had choice, they didn't choose non-violence over violence. They are really sick. I am very much concern about the people whose brain is poisoned with violence. They think violently, they believe violence can solve the problems. Baburam and Prachanda didn’t teach logic to the people, they taught violence. They didn’t teach justice, they taught revenge. Strength of nonviolence: Not only Gandhi and Martin Luther showed the strength of non-violence but Nepali people proved twice that the non-violence is stronger than violence. 1990’s people’s movement was also non-violent; we got democracy. 2006’s people’s movement was also non-violent, we achieved almost everything what we wanted. Think rationally, and rationally. What we got from non-violence and what we got from 10 years of violence. I accept Maoist’s contribution in this movement; however, the success of the revolution II is the great defeat of Maoist ideology. They said violence was the last resort, but they were absolutely wrong. Ten years long bloody Maoist war killed 13,000 people with almost no achievement; miracle happened in 13 days when 13 people died. If you have wit, you can think, and conclude how can war be the last choice? Maoists leaders are making fool out of you. They had done blinder mistake and are now trying to hide it with louder voice. contd....