180⁰ IMI Ji thank you, When we got democracy in 1990 Baburam went to people with his vision. His party got less than 10 sits out of 205; even laser in the next election. He has been seen saying proudly that his party was third largest party in the cabinet; he tried through peaceful way; but it didn’t work and finally he chooses violence as a last resort. He is making fool out of people. Third largest party and less than 10 seats out of 205, how can that be a matter of pride? Why couldn’t he convince people and got 2/3 majority in the house of representative and change everything he want? After getting majority in parliament, he should have tried for change and if king or anybody else came in the way he should have gone to people. Why couldn’t he do this? He is perfectly illogical freak and making fool out of people. There was injustice in the society. Baburam and Prachanda used poison to eradicate the injustice. There is no poison greater than the violence. There are better ways to deal with injustice other than the violence. How can a wise man accept violence as a solution of injustice? I strongly believe in non-violence. Nothing is stronger than the logic; if you use violence to make your point, you can not be right. Violence can be the last resort only for fools who don’t believe in the power of logic and nonviolence. Baburam and Prachanda have violence in their mind; all they can think is through violent way. A person who crosses the threshold of violence is considered psychologically disadvantaged. Baburam and Prachanda can have some psychological problem.