Gaule Hero's posting:- THIS IS THE CASE OF ROYALS BEHAVING BADLY. Traffic accidents and subsequent beatings used to be the trademark of PARAS "UDAY HUSSEIN" SHAH but looks like other royalists have imitated that tradition. The arguments from the MANDALE bros on this thread [don't want to name them 'cause they are so obvious] is that we should sympathize with "poor" Bharat Keshar and his gunda sons because they were "lynched" by a mob. Mandale bros are wrong again because they only see themselves as victims and forget that they are the victimizers. (1) The incident would not have happened if those guys had just ignored the little accident and proceeded to their cocktail party at the British Embassy. Instead they ended up beating a poor Sherpa. These guys still think they can break laws - like a feudal lord in the Middle Ages - and get away. (2) Second, even if it was Sherpa's fault [nobody knows unless you were at the scene] he does not deserve a beating, especially from someone driving a fancy car [or was it a SUV?]. IF OUR MANDALE FRIENDS WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE RULE OF LAW, THAT'S THE FIRST VIOLATION THERE. In which country does one gets beaten up for traffic accidents, except in Nepal involving royals and/or their chamchas? (3) The mob didn't lynch those gundas [lynching is beating and then hanging the body on a tree] but just participated in the brawl STARTED BY THE GUNDAS. Remember, first it was 3 people beating the Sherpa. When couple of hundreds arrived to support the Sherpa, the 3 people got beaten badly and deservedly so because they started the fight. WHY DON'T THE MANDALE TALK ABOUT 3 PEOPLE BEATING THE SHERPA AT THE FIRST INSTANCE? DO THEY THINK THAT'S OK? (4) What happened afterwards? The police inspector gets disciplined because he didn't arrive at the scene to protect the gundas from being beaten by the locals. Nobody talks about the police NOT arriving on time to protect the Sherpa from 3 gundas.