Mr. Lootekukur, The most important reason why Nepal should remain a hindu state and not a secular state is that it will remain peaceful in terms of religion by doing so. Sanatan 'hindu' religion is another name of peaceful co-existence in terms of religion. How many examples do you need? (i) Baber came from Samarkand with only 50 men. What was the consequence? Pakistan, Bangladesh, 250 million muslims in India, and millions of people killed in the name of hindu-muslim clash. Would there have been any clashes in the name of religion in Indian sub-continent had muslims not invaded that land? (ii) Christ was born Jew. He was a 'MAHAMANAV', no doubt. For his guilt of calling himself a son of God, what did jews do to him? Crucified. On the other hand, Buddha came to this earth 500 years before christ. He openly criticised Vedas in the 100% hindu land. What did we do to him? Several kings respected him. We put him as 9th incarnation of lord Vishnu. (iii) Before reneissance, how many crusades had been there and how many catholics and protenstants killed each other in the name of religion. How many scientiests and thinkers did these churches kill before reneissance? Only after reneissance, when they put church and state separate there had been very few conflicts in the name of relion in west. (iv) Muslims still fight among themselves for Shia-Sunni cause. How many of our Shivamargis and Vaishnavs have fought in the name of religion among themselves? How many hindus have tried to convert, forcefully or by temptation, people of other religions? These are only few. Only a hindu state where (i) Killing of cow is banned. (ii) Religion conversion is actively scrutinized by state. will make Nepalese live in peaceful co-existence in the name of religion. Once they see that they can convert people in the name of religion, dollars from middle east and churches will flow in Nepal to convert people only to prepare it for a huge religious clash 10-20 years from now.