I somewhat agree with Bidhan, not that I don't support the recent development. I think the timing could have been better; the constitution assembly could have revised this provision. It seems politically motivated this time, whereas we are trying to seperate politics with religion (ofcourse that is impossible). I am still wondering how we went about changing all these provisions in constitution without a formal ammendment or complete rewrite. I thought we had to wait until we elect the constitution assembly which would formulate the new constitution. If we are rejecting the current constitution, does that mean we are a nation without a formal constitution right now?