So what's the point of posting the article if we cannot criticize it? There are a few holes in his argument-- for example,not once does he mention some of the misdeeds the king has been a part of. I came across this blog that criticizes one of his articles. This is what he says: "An insane article straight from fantasy-land that argues Nepal needs a 'Leviathan' king, apparently oblivious to the fact that the man who commissioned this theory from Thomas Hobbes, Charles I, lost his head and ushered in a republic in Britain!" http://turtlesback.blogspot.com/