Dear Matyangro, I don't think the King was that wrong to deserve anything. It's Nepal's herd that think that way- the mobster herd - not the silent majority. The King took power according to constitution when the parliament was dead and the country was plagued by terrorism and corruption. He tried to put the corrupt behind bars. He called the parties again and again in every speech fot dialogue. He said - come for a dialogue for the sake of the nation. These bastards never went. How is it the King's fault? He said again and again he took power only for 3 yrs - he said by that time he wants to conduct elections. These bastards wouldn't go for election b/c they had not people to support them. Is that the King's fault??? Now nicely they got into power by getting into a dead parliament which is not even constitutionally correct and so they want to draft a new constitution. What rascals..... In America the constitution was made in 1800s and they never did any constitutional assemby. They just brought amendments. Nobody they brought to shout in their mob slogans knows what is constituent assembly - yet they want it... what a state of a country???