ARE YOU GUYS STILL ON THE SAME PLANET THAT WE ALL INHABIT? YOUR POINT NO. 1 AND 2 ARE NOW MOOT IF YOU ARE FOLLOWING THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN NEPAL. FOR POINTS # 3 AND 4, WHY NOT ADD A CLAUSE STATING THAT EARLIER MR. GYANENDRA AND (NOW LATE) DHIRENDRA MAHARAJAS HAD ACTIVE ROLE IN PROMOTING THE MAOISTS IN EARLY DAYS TO DEFAME DEMOCRACY AND MAKE WAY FOR DEMONOCRACY OF GYANENDRA BEFORE THE PALACE MASSACRE? YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO WHATEVER YOU WANT BECAUSE YOU ARE IN A FREE COUNTRY. BUT THANKS GOD, NEPALESE PEOPLE CAN ALSO BREATHE A LITTLE FREEDOM NOW ON, IF THE MANDALES DON'T CREATE MUCH PROBLEM. THE MOBILE PHONES HAVE ALREADY STARTED RINGING ONCE THE KING GAVE IN TO THE POPULAR DEMANDS. SEE THE DIFFERENCE IF YOU CAN (although I doubt it). WELL, SUBMIT IT IF YOU STILL WANT IT. BUT HOPE THESE AMBASSADORS UNDERSTAND IT AS A LAST CRY OF A FEW DERANGED AND DEFEATED INDIVIDUALS AND NOT THAT OF THE PEOPLE OF NEPAL. NEPALESE HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT INDIAN AND OTHER FOREIGN ROLE IN NEPAL BUT NOT THE NAIVE WAY YOU GUYS ARE DEMONSTRATING HERE. ON THE ONE HAND YOU ARE SAYING NEPAL HAS TO HAVE A RIGHT TO SELF RULE AND HENCE NO FOREIGN MEDDLING--WHICH BY THE WAY IS THE ONLY VALID POINT ALTHOUGH YOU CAN'T SAY IT AS SUCCINTLY, BUT AT THE SAME TIME YOU ARE ASKING THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT TO "PRESSURIZE" THE SEVEN PARTY ALLIANCE TO ACCEPT THE KING'S OFFER. CAN YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE? MAY BE YOU NEED TO TAKE SOME ENGLISH 101 CLASSES TO UNDERSTAND WHAT AN ARGUMENT SOUNDS LIKE AND HOW TO CONSTRUCT IT. YOU GUYS WERE JUST BUSY BLOWING YOUR PARENTS' ILL-GOTTEN MONEY WHEN YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO LEARN, AND NOW, LO, YOUR WRITINGS DISPLAY NOT ONLY THE ANXIETY YOU HAVE AT THE SPECTRE OF THE LOSS OF YOUR HEREDITARY PRIVILEGE BUT ALSO CHILDISH NAIVETTE AND INTELLECTUAL BANKRUPCY. I PITY YOU. THANK GOD THERE ARE BETTER NEPALIS.