ShriyaK, let's assume that maoist are not for peace and that only the king is for peace. Then , why didn't he respond the truce announced by maoist in last September? The maoists waited 4 months to see if the king comes with some positive mood for dialogue. Why the hell he has to deploy army in Rolpa while the maoists are following the ceasefire? Just yesterday Maoist Leader Prachanda, in an interview with Kantipur has reminded the king that they are ready for dialogue. The maoists have repeated their comittment that they would accept any outcome of constituent assembly election held under the supervision of UN. So, if the king has gut, why doesn't he test himself? Its the king and only king responsible for this bloodshed in the country. The maoists want to put the arms down but this is the king and his slaves who do not want that . Why? Its because, if maoists continue fighting..the king can continue sidelining the political parties and he will get chance to strengthen his autocracy in the country. The country is not his asset and people are not his slaves. ShriyaK, you don't have to label others who do not agree with you as "stupid", do you?