I may be wrong to sum-up our own esteemed Ashu-ji's opinions as: It may be wrong for sirish to disseminate misinformation about BG. But it may be OK for Mr. Subedi to disseminate misinformation as long as he didn't do it for money. But if I'm not wrong, shouldn't the obligation of accountability apply to everyone? I don't mean to get confrontational or take anyone's side, but I've been noticing conflicting statements from Ashu-ji lately. In this particular case, I believe that Mr. Subedi was [perhaps unconsciously] engaged in a wrongdoing, and he should admit it correct the problem because it's not just his, but his organization's credibility is in question. Should it really matter whether he did it for money or not? That said, someone should perhaps start a new thread on what this thread was really meant to be. :-)