Newuser dude, You have hinted evidently clear. :). Anyways, here is to our new twist. . . You said: "If you want me to declare in sajha that indisguise is not my suspect, declare categorically that you are not Anti_G." First, You know "Mr. I know what no one knows" , I always thought, it was "innocent till proven guilty," your account tells me it is "guilty till I prove my innocence". I wonder which coterie of radicals believes in this ;). I do not know :). Hehe. You see now I have understood you how lopsided you are. In my last post, I emphatically stated this. "I might disagree/argue with him, yes, but I would not stoop to the level you might choose to or that very person does." "If I have to disagree to him, I would do this in my name." What do these words tell you? I wonder what you read and what you understand. I am not an inflexible person newuser unlike you, I am not showing any rigidness and am categorically denying it. I am sorry I do not have a magic bowl to show who exactly is anti_g. But I reckon you do. LOL. I wonder would you even do your bit now. Now, moving on to another part, It's not my friends who suspects me newuser, but other sajhaities who knows me, and then some who does not. And many have mentioned that, you have quite evidently hinted it, which I could very well see. But do not get carried awaywith "suspect" word. They simply asked. Well to those who went on to express joy, my simple response were, I am not the right one to deserve, neither slack, nor praise for this. Whereas, after reading this . . . "About users from different states, Sherlock Holmes would certainly ask what if one prepared the write up in one state and than mailed or faxed to his friend in the other state, who logged in with the username Anti_G and posted it ? OR that from two different countries. Even A G ALberto Gonzales cannot settle this dispute, forget about San." I have understood what school of thoughts you belong to. You got me on that one. : ) Somewhere you mentioned, " I used to quarrel with some sajhaites myself in early days. But I have learnt from my experience that it was useless." --> LOL, what did you learn? ;) Whereas, listen to what you had to say. "Anti_G, your writing is so unique that it didn't take a third sentence TO KNOW who YOU are." "I am absolutely clear that you are someone else disguised as Anti _G and its your foolishness TO THINK THAT I CAN'T DISCERN YOUR writing. You got the clue already, haven't you?? "I am SURE I KNOW you." -----What even your A G ALberto Gonzales can never settle, you already did. No one can settle but I can ni hoina newuser. Bravo. You seriously have some magic bowl newuser. Did you write a letter to A G ALberto Gonzales that you could ?sure?ly settle what he never can? ;)