In Nepal there are three political options Maoist, King and the politicians - let's call the politicians the democratic party. There is no doubt that all three of them are bad and khattam and don't care about the common people. They are all khaobadis. Now faced with three prongs of evil like the trident, which one do you vote for? Forget maoist because they are barbarians. Now you have the choice of the King or the Democratic party. Now you have to think really hard which one would be better in todays context. Let's suppose, the King is ousted. Is the democratic party going to be able to control the country? Is the country going to be at least as less stable as it is right now under the kings regime? Right now things suck in Nepal under kings regime there is no doubt about that in anyones mind. But are we sure yet that the democratic government is not going to suck more if they are able to come into power and oust the king? Ask yourself that question. Without the King there is no leader in Nepal. Like it or not, the only person who can be called anywhere close to being a leader is the King. Yes, he did not deserve this position, but he has that position because of yada yada in the past, royal family, King PN shah united, yada yada successors.. yada yada now he's the king. Hey yes, the king's regime sucks, it does not give us human rights, yes. But are we willing to trust the democratic party and hope that things will be better under their regime? Couldn't everything crumble under their lack of leadership? What then? Have india come to rule us untill things get better? Are things ever going to get better? Let's get practical. That's all.