It's funny how everytime there is an argument against the King's action/current role/existence, the immediate response is "The ground zero scenario is different. Why don't you come to Nepal and do something?" I could be wrong on this, but monarchists, and even the confused in-betweens, do not say the same thing to anyone supporting the monarchy. Are we playing a weird game here where the rules apply to only one side? Ah Makartantra, you are the great! ---- 4:10. Time to go to another thread; heard somebody has dug into 2 months old archieves of the Kathmandu Post to make another real-Nepal-is-different-and-only-I-know-it argument!