Ashu Dai, Could you please enlighten me on the following issues--- of course, for discussion: 1. What is peace? 1a. What is peace for those who "have" and, for those who "have nots"? 1b. Why do "Gyanendras" need PEACE and "Rolpalis" need WAR? Is not it because Gyanendras "have" and Rolpalis "have nots"? Why is it not better to die in a WAR for Rolpalis than to die without food ? 1c. Why do Gyanendras "have" and "Rolpalis "have nots"? (Very important to know) 1d. What are the percentage of Gyanendras and Rolpalis in NEPAL---> 5% and 95% respectively or different? 1e. Is not there any difference between the peace in the line of corpses and peace in the happiness? Is not there any difference between the peace inside a JAIL and inside a free society? 1f. Why should we give permission to Gyanendras to kill people in the name of peace? What is the difference between Gyanendras' killing and Prachandas' killing ? Is not it similar? Is it better to kill those who "have nots" than to kill those who "have"? Is it a social justice? How can we believe that Gyanendras will bring a long-lasting peace? 2. How the essentials of human society: Human Rights, Freedom, Democracy and Peace are related with the vested interests of particular political ideologies? 2a. Why do Grandendras and Prachandas" afraid to accept these basic essentials of civil societies? 2b. How can we relate these basic essentials only with political parties? Do only political parties need all these or the general people need? 2c. Is THE FAILURE OF SOME LEADERS equivalent to THE FAILURE OF DEMOCRACY? Is it a fair and a good analysis? 2d. Why don't we think to replace the BAD leaders with the GOOD ones and preserve these essentials--- instead of giving chance to a FOOLISH/CRIMINAL DICTATOR along with our essentials? ---- OK PS: I do not have any problem to accept GYANENDRA, PRACHANDA or ANY POLITICAL LEADERS who do not take my personal rights, freedom, legal justice, democracy and peace. To me, only peace has NO MEANING.