RBaral, you said, "Wasn't that Germany case of cannibalism consensual, behind curtain, and between adults??" This incident cannot serve as an analogy to the incident that is mentioned here in this thread. When you bring up the incident in Germany, you are bringing up an incident where a person's life is involved. Everyone has a right to life, and that right is being violated even though the person involved agrees to it. If this wasn?t the case, euthanasia wouldn't be a subject to debate over. Even though every session in psychological counseling is strictly confidential and is protected federally, if the patient mentions events where someone?s life is under threat, the confidentiality code breaks right there. But here in this thread, we are simply talking about adults, who have decided to pleasure themselves privately without harming anyone. No one?s life is being threatened in this kind of event. And I assume that no one is being forced to join such acts, if it was, then that?s a different case. You also said, ?Act of this kind is utterly harmful to society.? If it was 50 years ago, and you had a couple who loved each other dearly but decided to make love before marriage, you would have probably said the same thing, right? But if that had happened, did it affect your life in anyway? Everything changes with time, and society is a part of it. If you believe in evolution and that humans are evolving constantly, it should be clear that human?s brain is also evolving. Just look at the changes in human life style, or society in whole. If our brains were to function in the same manner as always, we would not see any change in this world. So if there are changes in humans acts, and if those don?t hurt and hamper others lives, we should accept them freely, if not at least ignore them.