>>> The point is: You don't have to name names to deny other people a basic right to do as they please as adults in consensual relations that do not harm others, even when their sexual habits do NOT mirror the mainstream ones. The very fact that you talk about them and publish Web page-related info about them already VIOLATES their privacy rights. " ***** ADDITION: If these people were, say, actor Rajesh Hamal or actress Jhanara Bajracharya or other Nepalis of certain PUBLIC stature, one could perhaps justify the related blog entries in the name of, well, "paparazzi journalism" -- making the argument that the public has a right to know what certain public figures are up to. But these people appear to be utterly private citizens. That is why, their sex lives -- no matter how intriguing or how uncommon -- need not be fodder for blogosphere in the ironic name of "privacy rights" and "journalistic code of ethics". oohi ashu