Obviously people are going to be biased by emotion in such highly publicized case. It does not matter if it is in Nepal or the US. That?s why there is a special Jury selection, and if I am right there will be one in Ojha case. In Michel Jackson case in the US a lot of people hesitate to think he did it albeit all the proof. Others like J leno even go on the public TV to say he is guilty. Such talk of democracy was a mockery in OJ Simpson?s case. Even recent Actor Blake case smells very fishy where he was acquitted. People are people, they might have been aghast by the crime than to the ?perpetrator? and it is the court to put the blame on the ?person?. Unless the court is always definitely Right in ruling the verdict less the people will tend to wait and see, such is not the case in the US and in Nepal, the people have not experienced such cases for long to even feel there is such a jury.